1. Network Blogs

    1. Mike Barrett's Blog
    2. caseyholdahl's Blog
    3. Looking Up
    4. BlogShakaLaka
    5. Rice.
    6. make it better
    7. Tone's Blog
    8. DHawes22's Blog

  2. Iama Access

    1. News
    2. Message Boards
    3. Blazer Dancers
    4. Photos

mbmurr1's Blog

Return to blog listing -> Who should have been cut instead of Chris Johnson?
mbmurr1

Mar 18

Who should have been cut instead of Chris Johnson?

By mbmurr1 Posted in: Blazers, LaMarcusAldridge
I think Luke Babbitt should have been cut before Chris Johnson. What are your thoughts? Who do you think should have been cut? Do you think Chris Johnson was the best choice?
Previous Story: #4 the new #1
Next Story: Tank it

3 Comments

  1. i would have to say i would disagree. i do beleive CJ has more potential. We just have enough big men and if we let loose babbit we would only have batum as a small forward as im pretty sure shawne williams is injured.

    by aussieblazer on 3/19/2012 3:09 AM

  2. Yeah...you can't loose someone in Babbitt's position when you have Pryzbilla, Thomas, Smith and LMA...you add Johnson AND Thabeet and he never would have seen the floor anyways...

    by BillWaltonHomer on 3/19/2012 4:25 AM

  3. If you cut Babbitt then Batum is the only small forward and you lose all your depth at that position. I like Johnson but cutting Babbitt instead would be ridiculously horrible.

    by Angi on 3/22/2012 11:25 AM
  1. Leave a comment

PLEASE NOTE:
The views expressed on the Trail Blazers Blogger Network represent those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of the Trail Blazers organization, the NBA, or any other NBA team.

Blog Contributors

Most Commented

The most commented posts in the past month

Blog Archives