Message Boards > Trail Blazers Talk
Batum as the backup PG
You are not authorized to post a reply.
  1. Crim
    Crim
    Posts: 398

    Posted 06/13/2011 10:40 PM

    Assuming we keep andre for at least another year, why doesn't Batum come off the bench at PG more, think we'll see it in the future? We want him guarding the other teams fast point guards, why not give him minutes as point guard, or at least against the other teams backup point guard. This team's worst enemy is going to be a healthy roster if we keep loading it with budding star talent, so Batum needs to get out of these trade rumors because he could become the most versatile player off the bench, ever, Nate could figure out the best matchup possible for Batum to take advantage of, instead of playing him as a rotation backup for gerald, a controllable x factor every night.
    I am a fan of Not Feeding the Trolls.
  1. D_pickett
    D_pickett
    Posts: 608

    Posted 06/14/2011 12:15 AM

    Oh... wow.

    Ok, Batum can score at the rim pretty well, he can knock down threes, he's quick coming off picks, and he can defend perimeter players. That makes him a 3/2 combo role player. He can't box out or defend the post well enough to play 4 like we've tried to make him do.

    But BATUM AT POINT?! He can't handle the ball or pass well enough, and he doesn't have the IQ to run the offense. The only way I can see Batum playing point is if he were in the backcourt with Roy and Roy were doing 99% of the dribbling/playmaking.

    If you don't see Batum fitting in as the backup 3, maybe a trade is exactly what should happen. Not necessarily my opinion, but I think this idea is more indicative of desperation to find Batum a role on this team than anything else.
    I am a fan of
  1. Tray203
    Tray203
    Posts: 3

    Posted 06/14/2011 7:26 AM

    Posted By D_pickett on 06/14/2011 12:15 AM
    Oh... wow.

    Ok, Batum can score at the rim pretty well, he can knock down threes, he's quick coming off picks, and he can defend perimeter players. That makes him a 3/2 combo role player. He can't box out or defend the post well enough to play 4 like we've tried to make him do.

    But BATUM AT POINT?! He can't handle the ball or pass well enough, and he doesn't have the IQ to run the offense. The only way I can see Batum playing point is if he were in the backcourt with Roy and Roy were doing 99% of the dribbling/playmaking.

    If you don't see Batum fitting in as the backup 3, maybe a trade is exactly what should happen. Not necessarily my opinion, but I think this idea is more indicative of desperation to find Batum a role on this team than anything else.

    I agree 100%. Batum is a backup 2/3 and occasionally a  4. Solid defender, and can  play the 4 only against small lineups. He can shoot the 3 well, but is ball handling is way to suspect to let him have a backup PG role.
  1. mbmurr1
    mbmurr1
    Posts: 530

    Posted 06/14/2011 10:36 AM

    Batum at PG, that's like Crack being called a vitamin. 
    I am a fan of
  1. Crim
    Crim
    Posts: 398

    Posted 06/14/2011 11:50 AM

    He plays the point forward for his national team, and while his ball handling skills aren't (yet) exceptional, it's not something he couldn't focus on and become better at. There isn't a traditional 1 if you had a backcourt of Batum and Roy or Batum and Wesley or Wesley and Roy in at the same time, but that doesn't mean they couldn't be successful doing bringing the ball up court by committee.They ran rudy at the point last year to try and find him minutes, and his decision making ability and dribbling aren't way better than Batum's.
    It's not that I don't see Batum fitting at the 3, it's that we are logjammed at the 2, and neither Batum or Wallace seem to thrive at the 4. I don't think Batum has found his identity in this league yet because he doesn't have the ball enough early enough to gain confidence. With him playing the back court alongside Wesley or Roy they could bring it up by committee, I understand this wouldn't be a simple fix, but I don't think Batum needs to be traded, he just needs to find more ways to fill holes to plug when our ship is sinking.
    I am a fan of Not Feeding the Trolls.
  1. ClydeFrog
    ClydeFrog
    Posts: 975

    Posted 06/14/2011 2:20 PM

    Posted By D_pickett on 06/14/2011 12:15 AM
    Oh... wow.

    Ok, Batum can score at the rim pretty well, he can knock down threes, he's quick coming off picks, and he can defend perimeter players. That makes him a 3/2 combo role player. He can't box out or defend the post well enough to play 4 like we've tried to make him do.

    But BATUM AT POINT?! He can't handle the ball or pass well enough, and he doesn't have the IQ to run the offense. The only way I can see Batum playing point is if he were in the backcourt with Roy and Roy were doing 99% of the dribbling/playmaking.

    I have to agree. batum's skill set at handling the ball isn't where it needs to be for him to be a backup point guard. I hope he works out with Crash this offseason and learns how to handle the ball the way he does.
    I am a fan of Watching Elliot Williams Take Flight!
  1. D_pickett
    D_pickett
    Posts: 608

    Posted 06/14/2011 3:32 PM

    Ok, ok. IF (and this is a gargantuan IF) Batum were to improve his handling and decision-making enough to play point, that still doesn't really solve our problems, because now we have no backup 3 for the second unit, thus forcing our best players to play 40+ minutes.

    I'm not even saying that we should trade Nic; I like him at backup 3/2. But the point is that either we train one of our current players to fill the PG role and trade for a new backup SF--then deal with filling the starting point when Andre retires--or we trade for a PGOTF. I'm more in favor of the the second option.

    And just to clarify a couple things about basketball. First, a point forward and a point guard are two very different roles, even if they look similar superficially. Second, you don't want to depend on bringing the ball up by committee often. This is really only something that should be done when facing a full-court press/trap. Committees provide the outs and passing options for a player who is in danger of losing his dribble or the ball. Normally, and ideally, you want to have the other 4 players getting in position, setting off-ball picks, and cutting AS the point brings it past half-court.
    I am a fan of
- Hide
   
 
 
 
 
   

    Recent Discussions

  1. The Official Batum Petition Discussion Thread

    Started by cmeese47 on 05/21/13 at 1:03 PM

    Exactly I will not be a victim to the Batum potential hype anymore. 

  2. Playoffs.

    Started by RipCity 14 on 05/23/13 at 1:24 PM

    Strangely, there hasn''t been much talk about the ongoing playoff series. Who do you WANT to win, and who do you THINK will win. Conference Finals and the Gold Ring. I myself like all 4 teams (Miami only because of LBJ). My favourite is Memphis, a...

  3. I'm just going to say it.

    Started by RipCity 14 on 05/17/13 at 12:47 PM

    Posted By Siccolo on 05/22/2013 7:28 PM

    Some team will give him 5-6 million guaranteed contract with a team option the second year



    I thought David Kahn left Minnesota!

  4. Aldridge not on All NBA teams surprise?

    Started by cmeese47 on 05/23/13 at 11:56 AM

    I think my love affair with the frenchman is well recorded here, but he shouldn''t be getting all nba defence votes.

  5. The Mock Draft Thread

    Started by DHawes22 on 05/08/13 at 10:16 AM

    If we come out of this draft with Asik,and Oladipo I  would say we did very good.

  6. Snub of the Century?

    Started by RipCity 14 on 05/23/13 at 12:26 PM

    Yeah I hated Gangnam style after 2 days of over enthusiastic white people playing it multiple times. And I found it pretty funny. Chalupa man will be missed.

  7. I dont get it?

    Started by Curvychloe on 05/23/13 at 9:18 AM

    We would have one when I was done

  8. Who to take at No. 10?

    Started by DHawes22 on 05/21/13 at 6:44 PM

    Or Dallas keeps pick and drafts a foreign player meaning he does not count against the cap. No one is just going to give up a mid level first round pick even in a weak draft for 2 mid second round picks in an even weaker second round of a weak dra...

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  ... 
Active Forums 4.1
NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com
The latest from
Everybody
cmeese47 commented on The Official Batum Petition Discussion Thread / RipCity 14 created new forum topic Playoffs. / RyanMartinez joined group Season Ticket Holders / NickPitherUK and DHawes22 are friends now / Kyle Daniel Sallak updated their fan statement / djogone updated their scrapbook / djogone uploaded new photo / daddy updated their Starting 5 / MJB uploaded new video /