Message Boards > Trail Blazers Talk
Team Tournament: 1999-00 vs. 1990-91
You are not authorized to post a reply.
  1. DHawes22
    DHawes22
    Posts: 6481

    Posted 03/25/2010 3:14 PM

    Who do you think would win?
    1999-00 (59-23) (2)
     15%
    1990-91 (63-19) (11)
     85%
    Time to vote on new match-ups. Today is the 1999-00 vs 1990-91 teams. Vote on who you think would win AND tell us why you voted that way. You might be able to sway some of your fellow Blazermaniacs to vote with you.

    1999-00: Overall record: 59-23 (2nd in league, 2nd in conference, 2nd in division)
    Three losses---two of them on the basketball court---clouded an otherwise outstanding season for the Trail Blazers who recorded 59 victories to match their second-best best finish in franchise history. The biggest setback came May 5, just two days before the team opened its semifinal playoff series against Utah, when popular assistant coach Bill Musselman lost a six-month battle with a rare disease, primary systemic amyloidosis. Two weeks earlier, the Blazers lost their regular season finale at home to Denver, 96-95, and failed to post the franchise's second 60-win season. CONTINUE READING/Become a fan of this team

    1990-91: Overall record: 63-19 (1st in league)
    The Trail Blazers picked up where they left off the previous season when they were in the NBA Finals and captured world-wide basketball attention. They posted the league's best record, 63-19, the most wins ever by the franchise. They opened by winning their first 11 games and 19 of their first 20. They took their first eight away from home, extending a road winning streak over two seasons to 12 which equaled the second longest in NBA history. CONTINUE READING/Become a fan of this team


    I am a fan of
  1. DHawes22
    DHawes22
    Posts: 6481

    Posted 03/25/2010 4:42 PM

    I was very tempted to go with the 2000 team, because they had the Lakers beat but gave them the game, while the 91 team were completely outplayed, but in the end, I felt the team as a whole was much more complete in 91. Porter and Drexler gives Portland a remarkable advantage in the backcourt, Buck could D up Sheed, while the Pippen-Kersey head-to-head would be excellent to watch. Bottom line is Portland had a more heady team in 91, which showed in their heart how they fought back to reach the Finals the following year while the 00 team imploded amongst one another.
    I am a fan of
  1. ClydeFrog
    ClydeFrog
    Posts: 975

    Posted 03/26/2010 2:04 PM

    63 wins, 3 all-stars, and quite possibly one of the greatest teams to never win an NBA title. 99-00 got lucky getting past the Champs, but their luck runs out here. Rasheed, the '00's best player, is easily susceptible to mind games and I think Buck would rattle him up big time. If Buck could D up arguably the greatest PF of All-Time in Karl Malone both in 91 and 82, then he'd have a cake walk with Sheed. Also, I could see TP just drain 3's all day long over the top of Mighty Mouse while Drexler would work the much older Steve Smith all over the court.
    I am a fan of Watching Elliot Williams Take Flight!
  1. DHawes22
    DHawes22
    Posts: 6481

    Posted 03/29/2010 12:28 PM

    bump, only two days left to vote, so make it count!
    I am a fan of
  1. Dan Harbison
    Dan Harbison
    Posts: 219

    Posted 03/30/2010 10:23 AM

    That is a great match-up... but I don't think 99-00 could handle 90-91 defensively. TP would tear up Damon and I don't think an older Scottie could handle Clyde in his prime. Arvydas is the only upgrade even though Duck was an All-Star... I think Arvydas would have been craftier. Buck Williams would have shut 'Sheed down. In fact, now that I'm thinking of this... I don't think it would be a close series. 5 games probably.
    I am a fan of
- Hide
   
 
 
 
 
   

    Recent Discussions

  1. Rebuild Diagram 1B

    Started by billyamick47 on 05/23/13 at 8:25 PM

    Great point RipCity

  2. LMA League Leader

    Started by cmeese47 on 05/24/13 at 12:38 PM

    So we should trade Stotts, right?

  3. The Official Batum Petition Discussion Thread

    Started by cmeese47 on 05/21/13 at 1:03 PM

    Maniac he does not need play in Summer League. He does need to toughen up a lot and become more efficient.

  4. I dont get it?

    Started by Curvychloe on 05/23/13 at 9:18 AM

    Remember in Batman, how they had two ferries, one with prisoners, and one with civilians, both with bombs and they each had the remote for the other? This is what is happening now. You want to trade him before he leaves. Why not just get good piec...

  5. Trade/Free Agents Ideas

    Started by DoubleDz on 05/24/13 at 12:33 AM

    Dont think they trade him for JJ tho, they can just sign Hickson.


  6. Neil Olshey, NO BALLS!!

    Started by DoubleDz on 05/21/13 at 2:56 AM

    Dwight is a cancer we do not need.

  7. Who to take at No. 10?

    Started by DHawes22 on 05/21/13 at 6:44 PM

    I watched Shabazz at the combine and he was a poor shooter.  In fact he did  so bad he did not even show up for drills in day two.  He may be a scorer not a shooter.  If he throws up enough shots he scores.  If someone looks a...

  8. The Mock Draft Thread

    Started by DHawes22 on 05/08/13 at 10:16 AM

    I have not been overly impressed with splitter''s defense in the post season.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  ... 
Active Forums 4.1
NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com
The latest from
Everybody
Siccolo commented on Rebuild Diagram 1B / jimbany updated their fan statement / cmeese47 created new forum topic LMA League Leader / StacyMike68 joined group Season Ticket Holders / NickPitherUK and DHawes22 are friends now / djogone updated their scrapbook / djogone uploaded new photo / daddy updated their Starting 5 / MJB uploaded new video /